Videophilia vs. Mother Nature

Bad news: our deepening intimacy with electronic devices is apparently to blame for our growing apathy toward communing with nature.
 
“As a scientist and a conservationist, I find these results almost terrifying,” said Oliver Pergams, lead author of a new Nature Conservancy international recreation study published online by National Academy of Sciences. “We are seeing a fundamental shift away from people’s interest in nature, not just in the US but in other countries, too. The consequences of this could be deep and far-ranging for health, for human well-being, and for the future of the planet.”
 
Camping, hunting, fishing and national park visits have declined sharply for two decades, the researchers found. TV, video games and Internet use – videophilia is the term – are way up.
 
What’s a planet to do?
 
Almost as scary as the research is the fact it will take a new strategy to, yes, market nature: Said the authors, “Less exposure to nature seems to mean less environmental awareness and appreciation of nature for its own sake. Instead, people may come to value nature more for the goods and services nature provides, like photosynthesis and pollinators. Making people aware of the incredible value of such ecosystem services would become the more pragmatic approach.”
 
Ecosystem services? I think I need to take a walk.

Comments
The idea of having to market nature is scary indeed. Why can't more kids get out and appreciate all that Mother Nature has to offer? Hm.... I wonder if we can create a video game that makes them go out on some kind of scavenger hunt or something???
# Posted By Nancy Sathre-Vogel | 2/6/08 3:27 PM
Steve,

I'd like to see how the current "green" trend affects the park visit numbers. In a couple years the Nature Conservancy should check the data again to find out if more environmental awareness has helped to increase park visits. My guess is that the answer is no.
# Posted By misterteacher | 2/8/08 10:41 PM
I hope you're wrong and fear you're right : )
# Posted By Steve McGrath | 2/11/08 11:56 AM
Hmmph. I read the paper by Pergams and Zaradic and was distinctly unimpressed. They are measuring a "per-capita" decrease in outdoor activities, for instance 23% fewer per-capita visits to National Parks. Since the US population increased during their study period, it turns out that actual numbers of visits hardly decreased at all (about 4.7%.)

It's pretty obvious that if no new campgrounds are built, and popular campgrounds are always full, that as population grows the "per-capita" visit numbers decrease. I see this entire study as being a thinly-veiled attempt by a Nature organization to recruit new members.
# Posted By Bryan L. Allen | 4/8/08 11:12 PM
Powered By: BlogCFC via Ray Camden.    Design By: Harbour Light Strategic Marketing      Privacy policy    Terms and conditions